Sprawl nobody trusts
The tracker has nine copies, three owners and no version anyone fully believes. Meetings start with reconciling numbers instead of deciding.
Internal tools
Custom internal tools that fit how your team actually works: scoped and QA'd by a senior lead, built by a vetted pod, live in weeks at a fixed price.
Senior-led scope and QAA fixed price before we startLive in weeks, not quartersPlugs into the tools you already run
The tracker has nine copies, three owners and no version anyone fully believes. Meetings start with reconciling numbers instead of deciding.
The process lives across a form, two sheets, a chat thread and someone's inbox. Every handoff is a place where work quietly dies.
Your developers, if you have them, are building the product. The ops tool that would save ten hours a week never makes the sprint.
The template tool does 80% of the job and breaks on the 20% that makes your operation yours. So the spreadsheet comes back.
One expert scopes the tool around your real workflow, owns the quality, and stays your single point of contact from brief to handover.
Builders we recruited, trained and manage execute the backlog, which is why an internal tool takes weeks and not quarters.
You know the price and the delivery date before the build starts, and weekly demos show you exactly where it stands.
Mail, chat, sheets, databases and payment rails connect to the tool, so it replaces the duct tape instead of adding to it.
Who can see, who can approve, and what happened when: built in from the first scope conversation, not bolted on later.
Your team gets trained, your docs get written, and the tool keeps working after we leave. Support and change work are there when you need them.
Every one of these maps to something we have genuinely built or run: for clients, for their field teams, or for our own operations.
Track leads, clients or cases the way your process actually works, with the fields and stages your team argues about in the spreadsheet today.
One screen with the numbers that matter, pulled from the systems that hold them, instead of a Friday afternoon of copy-paste.
Shifts, sites and people matched in hours instead of days, with the rules your planners hold in their heads written into the tool.
Purchase requests, leave, expenses, sign-offs: one place to submit, one click to approve, a record of who decided what and when.
Data capture, task lists and payouts for people who work away from a desk, built for the phones they actually carry.
Queues, review screens and quality workflows for teams that process volume, the kind we build for our own data programmes.
How an internal tool happens
The tracker has a copy on every laptop. Finance keeps another. Every export forks the numbers again, and nobody can say which version is right.
Before anything gets built, a senior lead traces how the work actually moves: who requests, who approves, where it stalls, which copies are the same sheet twice.
Vetted builders turn the mess into screens. The tracker becomes a live table, approvals become one click, the report builds itself. Fixed scope, weekly demos.
Mail, chat, your database: the tool connects to them instead of replacing them, so nothing gets typed twice and nothing falls between systems.
Handover, training and support included. The number in the meeting is the number in the tool is the number in the report.
Custom shift scheduler
“The scheduling and workforce platform Werkit built changed everything. What used to take over a month now takes hours, and unpaid hours dropped to zero. We would not have been able to retain our client without the solution Werkit built.”
Senior product leadership
“Working with Jean-Samuel is always super straightforward and reassuring. He knows how to frame things properly, turn needs into clear specs and add the right technical depth to make projects stronger. With his clear communication and reliable delivery, he is genuinely a Product Manager I'm always happy to work with.”
Most internal tools land in the first two bands. You get the real number after a scope call with a senior lead, and it does not move once we agree it.
One workflow, done properly: an approvals flow, a tracker with roles, a reporting screen.
A full tool your team logs into every day: several workflows, integrations, dashboards.
Multi-team systems: complex permissions, heavy integrations, field apps, audit requirements.
Most internal tools go live in two to six weeks. The senior lead scopes it with you first, so you get a real timeline and a fixed price before anything is built, and weekly demos from the first week.
Bubble and modern web stacks, AI-accelerated, chosen per project. The senior lead picks what fits your requirements, your integrations and your team; you always get working software your team logs into, not a prototype.
Yes, and it usually should. Email, Slack and chat, spreadsheets, databases, payment providers and most SaaS tools with an API can feed the tool or be fed by it, so nobody enters the same data twice.
You get handover, training and documentation as part of the build, and we offer ongoing support and change work after that. Many clients keep a small monthly allowance for improvements; others take full handover and come back when they need more.
Roles and permissions are part of the scope from day one: who can see what, who can approve what, and what gets logged. Data lives in your accounts wherever possible, and we agree data handling in the scope before the build starts.
The scope is fixed; the roadmap isn't. Because the same senior lead stays accountable, the tool can grow in planned increments: new modules, more automation, more integrations, each scoped and priced before it starts.
Start a project
Describe the workflow that hurts: who touches it, where it stalls, what it costs you. A senior lead reads every brief and comes back with scope questions or a fixed-scope quote.
Prefer email? hello@werkitdata.com